Every day thousands of consumers — hard working businessmen and women, mothers, fathers, grandmothers, students — walk through airport security where their purses, bags and wallets are screened and cleared on their way to their new destinations. Yet, unbeknownst to their carriers and their fellow passengers, they are carrying highly explosive materials onto their planes — ticking time bombs in the form of little pieces of plastic, that could blow up at any moment and incite what could amount to personal financial terror.
I am, of course, talking about credit cards, because the banks that issue them have had the ability for years to explosively increase the interest rates on your outstanding balances for virtually any reason. Through the artifice of carefully thought out contract provisions and court precedents in selective states, banks have had free reign to set off their own version of a hidden bomb, which consumers have carried willingly after being aggressively solicited and enticed into playing the card issuers’ profit making game.
I’ve Been “Jacked”!The explosions set off by card issuers when they cause your interest rates to go through the roof, and thus increase the minimum payments and the cost of the purchases you already made with the card and had budgeted for can set off other explosions in your vicinity — the rates on other cards in your purse or wallet may blow up too. While it can only take one rate increase to ruin an already weak budget, a series of such explosions often leads to the destruction of a consumer’s finances and bankruptcy.
Interest rate increases on credit cards have been a huge source of profits for banks, but the current recession and the joblessness faced by millions of card holders has caused the detonation of their little bombs (which banks handed out like candy prior to the recession) to blow up in their faces.
The default rate on these credit card accounts are at historic highs. For more on this, please read this recent post on Mike Shedlock’s (Mish) blog: reflections-on-credit-card-fees-and-chargeoffs.
Now however, with the soon to be enacted CARD ACT, many of the banks’ trick and trap policies, which were designed to ensnare the public into becoming debt servicing slaves, are about to be curbed. However, banks will and have already begun to adjust to the coming new reality by finding new ways to profit from their plastic explosives.
One way they are doing that is by switching consumers’ interest rates from fixed to variable rates based on a formula that might charge say 12.9% above prime. Although this switch may not seem like a big deal right now with federal interest rates at historic lows, those rates will most certainly rise in the not too distant future, perhaps significantly, and when they do, the cost of using their credit cards will increase for consumers. In other words, those plastic explosives will detonate in consumers’ wallets yet again, sending potentially more shock waves through their finances. And unfortunately, I suspect that the timing of these future interest rate increases will come at a time when our economy is widely recognized to be solidly on the path to recovery.
For another example of how far those who issue standard grade plastic explosives in the name of profit will go to get around the CARD Act, please read nationally-syndicated personal finance columnist Kathy Kristof’s personal story in her recent blog post, Credit Reform and My New 703.8% Card.
Kristof wrote:
“Consumer reporters were all crowing about a 79.99% rate credit card that was launched in response to credit reform a few months ago–collectively horrified that a law designed to cut rates and eliminate sneaky fees was inspiring increasingly abusive bank behavior. I thought that was about as bad as it gets until I took a close look at the statement for my new Macy’s card, which I had opened with “instant credit” while Christmas shopping. It made that 79% card look like a bargain.”
Kristof went on to explain that based on her average daily balance of $3.41, her minimum charge worked out to “an actual annual percentage rate” of 703.80%!!!! Also, her blog linked to a good resource over at www.getrichslowly.org for additional information about the CARD ACT. Click: An Act To Inhibit The Placement Of Small Incendiary Devices Upon American Citizens to read more.
For additional information about the CARD ACT and to learn how you can win free help from Consumer Recovery Network, a fair and ethical debt settlement firm, by sending it your personal story of what happened to you when one of your banks triggered your plastic explosive and the rate on your credit card went sky high, visit CARD ACT-CRN Contest.
More than half of the debt-stressed consumers my company has consulted with over the past several years has indicated that “a plastic explosion” was a key factor in their being unable to keep up with their debts. Furthermore, if you’ve been hit by plastic shrapnel, I know that you will easily relate to the analogies I have used here. I know they are appropriate because I work with the carnage of these explosions every day.
Looked at in this perspective, card issuers and their fee traps have already blown up the finances of millions of consumers. How many more explosions will we see between now and February 22nd when rate jacking, as we have known it, will end? While I see the variable interest rate ticking time bomb referenced earlier in this blog as having the greatest potential to spark renewed controversy over credit cards, many card issuers have already mentioned they will revert back to the annual fees they charged years ago and that they will also be limiting the rewards programs that they used to compete for market share and consumer loyalty.
By the way, a great place to compare credit card interest rates and reward programs and to read consumer feedback about specific cards is “Credit Card Ratings”. Now, more than ever, in this rapidly changing credit card marketplace, it is important that you use respected, reliable resources to research and understand the credit products you are using or considering using.
It’s our way of celebrating the fact that in February of this year, the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act will prohibit credit card companies from rate jacking consumers. This means that their pernicious practice of increasing interest rates on consumers’ existing account balances, for virtually any reason, will end. But before going into the contest details, I want to quickly outline why CRN believes that the end to rate jacking merits a contest.
There are many reasons why so many consumers struggle with crushing debt; cut in work hours, job loss, medical issues, and other difficult events are just some of the more common. But rate jacking (also known as universal default) is another reason, and when consumers are rate jacked, they become the victims of greedy creditors searching for higher profits under the guise of risk management.
One of the effects of rate jacking is that it increases the cost of purchases consumers have already made and budgeted for. It also increases their monthly minimum payments, making it almost impossible, for many consumers to keep current. Some of these consumers end up having to pursue credit counseling, debt settlement, or bankruptcy to deal with their debts. Case in point, over the last several years, more than half of all the consumers CRN consulted with had had their interest rates increased.

Adding insult to injury, when a consumer is rate-jacked by one creditor, the consumer’s other creditors usually follow suit. Often, when this occurs, consumers who would have been able to get out of debt by applying a simple debt rollup strategy, lose that option.
During the months leading up to implementation of the CARD Act, the media has spilled a lot of ink on this topic. I have also written about and spoken against rate-jacking more times than I can count. So, the end of rate jacking is a GREAT REASON TO CELEBRATE!
Submit your personal rate jacking story to CRN no later than 1/31/10. You can submit it via the comment section of this blog post (see below), by email (michael@consumerrecoverynetwork.com) or send it by regular mail:
CRN
217 Cedar St. #281
Sandpoint ID 83864
There is no limit on the length of your story. The only criteria are:
The winner will receive a FULL CRN Membership at absolutely NO COST! This includes the CRN “Settle Down” educational series, full service debt negotiation services, and unlimited one-on-one assistance and support from an assigned CRN specialist for a period of 2 years. Depending on the winner’s financial circumstances, and the results of program implementation, the prize value may be worth thousands of dollars. (prize is transferrable; see below)
CRN staff will read all entries and choose 6 semi-finalists. Then, a panel of CRN specialists, personal finance writers and well-known consumer advocates will choose a winner from those 6. The contest winner will be notified by phone and email, and will have 90 days to claim their prize. Their story will be published here on 2/15/2010.
What a unique opportunity to tell your story & win a great prize that can help turn your finances around!
Michael Bovee, CRN President
Well… maybe shocking to some.
I do not often post on consults I do. This one from about six weeks ago provides both warning and sound advice.
A gentleman in Indiana called in to the toll free line here at Consumer Recovery Network after hitting our website while researching debt settlement. I answered the call and proceeded down a list of general things I ask during a typical debt consultation.
He had already spoken to a representative of a NY law firm after hearing a radio commercial advertising services to reduce debt. He felt he had a pretty good foundation of what settlement was. As I started to lay out some facts about debt settlement, he started to lay out a little confusion. His confusion is a direct result of things that were not covered in his consult with the representative of the law firm.
The end result of the consult I did was that he now knew about the knock on effects of settlement and that it should only be considered as an alternative to bankruptcy. He recognized he was not close to bankruptcy, but did have a need to get out of debt. During the consult he recognized he could quickly sell 2 cars he was not using for under blue book and pay off his credit cards.
I heard from him the next day.
Being the considerate type, he had called the law firm rep after speaking with me, to inform him he would not need to enroll in his program. The rep (obviously the consummate closer) tried to overcome his objections and continue to sell him on settlement.
He told the rep that he did not want late payments reported on his credit report for the next 7 years. The rep told him “Oh, that’s only for corporations”!
He told the rep that he was not willing to risk being sued. The reps response was “Well… I suppose it could happen, but you would be the first”!
First what? First person the rep lied to that day? This guy exemplifies what is wrong in the industry! He should be answering his telephone with “Thank you for calling the Bib-N-Fib. Can I take your order?”
I could tell my car selling buddy thought I would be shocked to hear that someone was so willing to deceive in order to make a buck. Instead, I shocked him when I informed him it came as no surprise at all. I did tell him that I was highly skeptical that the representative that he was speaking with was an actual employee of the law firm. The rep was likely just a sales guy at a call center where callers from radio and TV ads are funneled, and whose only purpose is to sell callers on settlement so they can get paid a commission. Even if they have to lie, omit or deceive to do it!
I don’t think car guy would have gotten the same nonsense if he called the law firm directly.
The point of this article:
Consumers should only speak to the actual service provider they would work with. Any middle man has one motivation and that is the commission. Some are far more artful in their selling techniques than who car guy talked to (let’s hope most), but why would you need to speak with anyone other than who you are going to work with? You wouldn’t.
If you are looking into bankruptcy and have a consultation (do more than 1), you are speaking to the attorney or an employee of the firm on their direct telephone line or standing in the office.
If you are looking into a debt management plan offered through consumer credit counseling, you are speaking to the counselor or an employee of the agency on their direct telephone line or standing in the office.
Why in the world should you look into a settlement company any other way? You shouldn’t.
There are thousands of places on the internet offering a consultation to see how they can help you get out of debt. There is a daily bombarding of radio and television commercials offering debt help. The vast majority have no direct connection to the company that will actually be providing you a product or service.
If you hear from whom ever you are speaking to that they are going to “refer” you to the best, most reputable this that or the other thing, your talking to a sales guy. He or she gets paid by selling to you and will not be working with you after you start. They often have no accountability to the actual service provider.
ALWAYS start at the source!
I cannot identify one exception to this. Can you?