An End to Rate-jacking is Cause for Celebration!

CRN is Holding a Contest!

It’s our way of celebrating the fact that in February of this year, the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act will prohibit credit card companies from rate jacking consumers. This means that their pernicious practice of increasing interest rates on consumers’ existing account balances, for virtually any reason, will end. But before going into the contest details, I want to quickly outline why CRN believes that the end to rate jacking merits a contest.

There are many reasons why so many consumers struggle with crushing debt;  cut in work hours, job loss, medical issues, and other difficult events are just some of the more common. But rate jacking (also known as universal default) is another reason, and when consumers are rate jacked, they become the victims of greedy creditors searching for higher profits under the guise of risk management.

One of the effects of rate jacking is that it increases the cost of purchases consumers have already made and budgeted for. It also increases their monthly minimum payments, making it almost impossible, for many consumers to keep current. Some of these consumers end up having to pursue credit counseling, debt settlement, or bankruptcy to deal with their debts. Case in point, over the last several years, more than half of all the consumers CRN consulted with had had their interest rates increased.

Adding insult to injury, when a consumer is rate-jacked by one creditor, the consumer’s other creditors usually follow suit. Often, when this occurs, consumers who would have been able to get out of debt by applying a simple debt rollup strategy, lose that option.

During the months leading up to implementation of the CARD Act, the media has spilled a lot of  ink on this topic. I have also written about and spoken against rate-jacking more times than I can count. So, the end of rate jacking is a GREAT REASON TO CELEBRATE!

Contest Details:

Submit your personal rate jacking story to CRN no later than 1/31/10. You can submit it via the comment section of this blog post (see below), by email (michael@consumerrecoverynetwork.com) or send it by regular mail:

CRN
217 Cedar St. #281
Sandpoint ID 83864

There is no limit on the length of your story. The only criteria are:

1. You must describe having been “jacked” by one or more of your creditors and the effects that it had on you.
2. Your entry should indicate if you have resolved the problems that resulted from the rate jacking. If you have , please explain.
3. You must include your name (first name is sufficient), a valid email address and your daytime phone number (when submitting your story via the comment section of this blog, this information will not be made public). You may be contacted by me or another CRN debt specialist for additional details about your experience.

The winner will receive a FULL CRN Membership at absolutely NO COST! This includes the CRN “Settle Down” educational series, full service debt negotiation services, and unlimited one-on-one assistance and support from an assigned CRN specialist for a period of 2 years. Depending on the winner’s financial circumstances, and the results of program implementation, the prize value may be worth thousands of dollars. (prize is transferrable; see below)

CRN staff will read all entries and choose 6 semi-finalists. Then, a panel of CRN specialists, personal finance writers and well-known consumer advocates will choose a winner from those 6. The contest winner will be notified by phone and email, and will have 90 days to claim their prize. Their story will be published here on 2/15/2010.

What a unique opportunity to tell your story & win a great prize that can help turn your finances around!

Michael Bovee, CRN President

NOTE: CRN reserves the right to publish any contest submissions, but will never publish your name. CRN understands that some consumers who enter CRN’s contest may have already resolved the financial problems that were the consequence of their having been rate jacked. For example, they may have been forced to file bankruptcy. Therefore, if one of these consumers is chosen as the winner of CRN’s contest, that individual can transfer their prize to a friend, family member or co-worker who can benefit from a CRN membership. Who doesn’t know someone who could use help getting out of debt? Especially in this economy!

SHOCKING EYE WITNESS DEBT SETTLEMENT REPORT!

Well… maybe shocking to some.

I do not often post on consults I do. This one from about six weeks ago provides both warning and sound advice.

A gentleman in Indiana called in to the toll free line here at Consumer Recovery Network after hitting our website while researching debt settlement. I answered the call and proceeded down a list of general things I ask during a typical debt consultation.

He had already spoken to a representative of a NY law firm after hearing a radio commercial advertising services to reduce debt. He felt he had a pretty good foundation of what settlement was. As I started to lay out some facts about debt settlement, he started to lay out a little confusion. His confusion is a direct result of things that were not covered in his consult with the representative of the law firm.

The end result of the consult I did was that he now knew about the knock on effects of settlement and that it should only be considered as an alternative to bankruptcy. He recognized he was not close to bankruptcy, but did have a need to get out of debt. During the consult he recognized he could quickly sell 2 cars he was not using for under blue book and pay off his credit cards.

I heard from him the next day.

Being the considerate type, he had called the law firm rep after speaking with me, to inform him he would not need to enroll in his program. The rep (obviously the consummate closer) tried to overcome his objections and continue to sell him on settlement.

He told the rep that he did not want late payments reported on his credit report for the next 7 years. The rep told him “Oh, that’s only for corporations”!

He told the rep that he was not willing to risk being sued. The reps response was “Well… I suppose it could happen, but you would be the first”!

First what? First person the rep lied to that day? This guy exemplifies what is wrong in the industry! He should be answering his telephone with “Thank you for calling the Bib-N-Fib. Can I take your order?”

I could tell my car selling buddy thought I would be shocked to hear that someone was so willing to deceive in order to make a buck. Instead, I shocked him when I informed him it came as no surprise at all. I did tell him that I was highly skeptical that the representative that he was speaking with was an actual employee of the law firm. The rep was likely just a sales guy at a call center where callers from radio and TV ads are funneled, and whose only purpose is to sell callers on settlement so they can get paid a commission. Even if they have to lie, omit or deceive to do it!

I don’t think car guy would have gotten the same nonsense if he called the law firm directly.

The point of this article:

Consumers should only speak to the actual service provider they would work with. Any middle man has one motivation and that is the commission. Some are far more artful in their selling techniques than who car guy talked to (let’s hope most), but why would you need to speak with anyone other than who you are going to work with? You wouldn’t.

If you are looking into bankruptcy and have a consultation (do more than 1), you are speaking to the attorney or an employee of the firm on their direct telephone line or standing in the office.

If you are looking into a debt management plan offered through consumer credit counseling, you are speaking to the counselor or an employee of the agency on their direct telephone line or standing in the office.

Why in the world should you look into a settlement company any other way? You shouldn’t.

There are thousands of places on the internet offering a consultation to see how they can help you get out of debt. There is a daily bombarding of radio and television commercials offering debt help. The vast majority have no direct connection to the company that will actually be providing you a product or service.

If you hear from whom ever you are speaking to that they are going to “refer” you to the best, most reputable this that or the other thing, your talking to a sales guy. He or she gets paid by selling to you and will not be working with you after you start. They often have no accountability to the actual service provider.

ALWAYS start at the source!

I cannot identify one exception to this. Can you?

FICO Reveals Timely Credit Score Damage Details For the Struggling Consumer

FICO Data Reveals That Settling Your Debts Damages

Your Credit Scores Less Than Filing for Bankruptcy

FICO, the company that calculates consumers’ FICO scores — the scores that are the most widely used by American creditors to determine whether or not they will extend credit to a particular consumer and the terms of that credit — recently released data showing how different negative actions consumers might take in regard to their credit will affect their scores. Among other things, the data shows that settling your debts is far less damaging to your FICO scores than filing for bankruptcy. In other words, the data helps make the case for why settlement rather than bankruptcy is an excellent alternative for many cash-strapped consumers, assuming that they either settle their own debts or work with a reputable settlement firm that charges fairly for its services.

The data released by FICO and available on its web site at: http://www.myfico.com/crediteducation/questions/Credit_Problem_Comparison.aspx, shows that as a consequence of filing for bankruptcy, consumers may see as much as a 240 point drop in their FICO scores. In contrast, if they settle their debts, their FICO scores may drop by 125 points at most. Interestingly because of the way that FICO scores are calculated, when consumers have higher scores prior to either filing for bankruptcy or settling their debts, their credit scores are harmed more by settlement or bankruptcy than are the scores of consumers who had lower FICO scores to begin with. According to FICO, the reason for this difference is that the scores of lower scoring consumers already reflect their credit missteps.

Despite the FICO data, I must caution you not to base your decision about which debt relief option to pursue based on that information. All debt relief options — credit counseling, settlement and bankruptcy — will have a negative effect on your credit histories and/or FICO scores for some time. (See my recent blog, Debt Relief Options vs. Your Credit Score).

When you are deciding how to deal with your debt, your primary concerns should be gaining a clear understanding of how each option works and its pros and cons, and determining whether the numbers associated with a particular option make sense for you. For example, your first test if you are considering settlement should be whether or not you can accumulate the money you need to fund your creditors’ settlement offers before your risk of being sued by them for what you owe begins to escalate. If you cannot come up with the money you need to settle your debts relatively quickly, then bankruptcy is probably your better option.

For free help determining which debt relief option would work best for you, fill out CRN’s consultation request form: https://www.consumerrecoverynetwork.com/contact