How’s that working for ya Mr. Banker?

I have long held the position: If banks cannot be profitable by lending money at no higher than 15% interest, they should be considered too incompetent to be a bank.

Currently the cost of money for the banks is next to nothing, but they loan it out charging consumers as much as 30%. That is quite a spread!

The argument I hear for high interest rates is often one of risk. The banks use available data from resources like your credit report which may (or may not) suggest that your behavior reflects a higher risk of default. This risk data is then used, by applying some twisted logic, as justification for increasing your interest rates. Let’s see… some arbitrary or even actual data shows an account holder is at higher risk for not being able to make one of their payments and so the bank’s solution is to increase your rates making your payment higher than those at a lower risk. Gee, that’ll assure timely payment! How’s that working for ya Mr. Banker?

Judging from the increase in bankruptcies, delinquencies and charge offs… Not so much!

Obviously, the current job market is adding to the payment pressure consumers are under, but even those who are employed are often just one interest rate increase away from the edge of a financial cliff. I speak to them daily.

This Bloomberg article from yesterday: A CLUE, shows that some in a position to affect change, via the proposed legislation, actually get it.  It doesn’t take a crystal ball to see that a cap on interest rates will provide for a future where consumers can actually afford to borrow, spend, and successfully pay back their debt, thereby assisting in an economic recovery. There are lawmakers who possess, or are willing to borrow from their constituents, the backbone needed to support a return to sound lending principles.

Yes, I understand that we are approaching an election cycle and perhaps there is a desire by politicians to look good at home, but this legislation has never been more relevant than it is today.

Let’s hope it gets the traction it needs this time!

Hopeful of Reducing High Interest Rates Results in Lining Scammers Pockets

FTC Sues Three Companies Marketing Bogus Credit Card Rate Reduction Programs to Consumers

The FTC announced this week that it had filed lawsuits against three companies: Economic Relief Technologies LLC, Dynamic Financial Group (U.S.A.) Inc., and JPM Accelerated Services, http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/12/robocall.shtm. The lawsuits, which were filed in Florida, Georgia and Ilinois, allege that the companies have been marketing worthless credit card interest rate reduction programs to consumers via automated phone calls, also known as ‘robo” calls. According to the FTC, not only have the companies failed to deliver on their promises, but their calls have violated the federal Telemarketing the Do Not Call Rules.

Telemarketers working for the three companies told consumers who were interested in the program that the program would allow them to save thousands of dollars in interest within a short period of time and would make it possible for them to pay off their debts faster. Consumers were also told that to achieve these benefits they would have to pay as much as $1,495 up-front, but were promised that if they did not save a “guaranteed” amount — usually $2,500 — they could get their up-front payment back. Few consumers ever received a refund however.

Consumers who want to learn more about their rights and responsibilities regarding pre-recorded telemarketing calls, should read the following two FTC alerts: New Rules for Robocalls and Reining in Robocalls, which can be found at http://ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt162.shtm and http://ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/alerts/alt161.shtm.

Consumers should know that they have just as much likelihood (if not more) of successfully reducing their interest rates with their creditors on their own rather than by paying someone to attempt to do it for them. If you try it on your own and you hit a brick wall, do not get discouraged. Try again a week or so later and you may have success.

One little tip for those consumers whose high interest rate credit cards may force them to make a payment late: Missing a payment by as a little as a week or two will often give your account a different status that will qualify you for interest rate and minimum payment reductions that were curiously unavailable to you prior to your late payment. However, I must stress that this strategy for getting such reductions is only appropriate for someone who was already unlikely to be able to meet the minimum payment requirement.

Debt Settlement and the Negative Bias by Media

Media’s Lack of Understanding About Debt Settlement’s Potential for Consumers

is Frustrating and Bad for Consumers

Sure, there are exceptions, but I’ve found that most media run the other way when it comes to covering debt settlement. They seem completely unwilling to get educated about do-it-yourself settlement options and about ethical debt settlement firms like CRN, that provide debt-stressed consumers with a valuable service and charge them fairly for that service, unlike most debt settlement firms. Instead, they either ignore debt settlement or they paint debt settlement firms with a broad brushstroke, characterizing every firm in the industry as a rip off.

Not only is this characterization unfair to those members of the settlement industry that truly want to help consumers get out of debt, but it’s also unfair to consumers who are burdened down with debt and looking for a way out. If they work with the right firm, debt settlement can be a great solution for many of those consumers. Yet, most media reports scare consumers about settlement and warn them to steer clear.

With countless consumers struggling to deal with mountains of debt and with the consumer bankruptcy rate on the rise, the media is doing consumers a disservice by not providing them with fair and balanced information about debt settlement. By fair and balanced I mean:

• explaining the goal of debt settlement

• detailing when settlement is an appropriate option and how it compares to other debt management options

• educating consumers about how to settle their own debts and the resources available to help them

• telling consumers how to chose a reputable debt settlement firm

• warning consumers about the warning signs that a firm is not on the up and up

So, I am issuing the media a challenge: Get informed about debt settlement! Understand how it can (and should) work and who it’s right for, warn consumers about the bad firms, and inform them about the good ones. Under the right circumstances, debt settlement can be a great option for consumers and every bit as legitimate an option as debt consolidation, working with a credit counseling agency or filing for bankruptcy. So, it’s time for the media to inform consumers who are drowning in debt that there is another option available to them — debt settlement.